• Users Online: 98
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 93-96

Impact of pets as nonpharmacological antihypertensive maneuver in hypertensive patients


Department of Cardiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Date of Submission15-Apr-2020
Date of Decision08-May-2020
Date of Acceptance22-May-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Candan Mansuroglu
Department of Cardiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJCA.IJCA_9_20

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Background: Nearly half of the population has elevated blood pressure in industrialized world.Various lifestyle changes were described as non- pharmacological maneuvers in controlling hypertension. Aim: We planned this study to evaluate the impact of pets as a non- pharmacological antihypertensive maneuver in hypertensive patients. Materials and Method: A total of 5042 hypertensive patients were participated a validated and self applied questionnaire and inquiring current status about having a pet. Results: A total 562 patients consisting of dog owners, cat owners and farm animal owners were enrolled in this study. No-pet owners had mean systolic blood pressure( SBP)- 143. 9 mmHg(141. 3 mmHg – 145. 1 mmHg) and mean diastolic blood pressure( DBP)- 77. 6 mmHg(76. 5 mmHg– 78. 5 mmHg). Cat owners were 339 patients( 6. 05%) had mean SBP- 132. 8 mmHg( 130. 5 mmHg– 135. 3 mmHg) and mean DBP- 74. 7 mmHg( 74. 8 mmHg– 75. 3 mmHg). Dog owners were 158 patients( 2. 82%) had mean SBP- 139. 5 mmHg( 138. 1 mmHg– 141. 2 mmHg) and mean DBP- 77. 2 mmHg( 76. 3 mmHg– 78. 2 mmHg). And farm animal owners were 65 patients ( 1. 1%) had mean SBP- 133. 6 mmHg( 135. 4 mmHg– 139. 8 mmHg ) and mean DBP- 73. 2 mmHg( 74. 2 mmHg– 76. 2 mmHg). Male sex( odds ratio [OR], 1. 17, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1. 07 - 1. 28, P = 0. 002 ), farm animal ownership( OR, 1. 08, 95% CI, 1. 06 -1. 11, P = 0. 003) and aging ( OR, 1. 23, 95% CI, 1. 27 -1. 38, P < 0. 001) were significantly associated with higher blood pressures. Cat owners and farm animal owners used fewer medication( OR 1. 9; 95% CI, 1. 61–2. 72, P = 0. 003) and (OR 2. 09; 95% CI 1. 61–2. 72, P =: 0. 001) respectively. Conclusion: Our study results showed pet ownership were associated with better blood pressure control and less medication. Owning a pet is lower in our country than developed world. This study results can be used to adopt stray animals in metropolitans but it must be kept in mind it is better to choose the appropriate animal to patients' natality.

Keywords: Hypertension, pet ownership, nonpharmacological maneuver


How to cite this article:
Mansuroglu C. Impact of pets as nonpharmacological antihypertensive maneuver in hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiovasc Acad 2020;6:93-6

How to cite this URL:
Mansuroglu C. Impact of pets as nonpharmacological antihypertensive maneuver in hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiovasc Acad [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24];6:93-6. Available from: https://www.ijcva.com/text.asp?2020/6/3/93/296239




  Introduction Top


Hypertension accounting for almost 10 million deaths and over 200 million disability-adjusted life years is the major cause of early death.[1],[2],[3] Lowering blood pressure (BP) is associated with reduced premature morbidity and mortality. A number of proven, highly effective, well-tolerated lifestyle, and drug treatment strategies can achieve this reduction in BP. As population ages, people adopt a more sedentary lifestyle causing an increase in body weight and a rise in the prevalence of hypertension.[4] Some nonmedical measures such as increased physical activity, keeping an ideal body weight, and eating a healthy diet are suggested in the first treatment step to reduce morbidity and mortality.[5],[6],[7] Stress is the major contributor to the cardiovascular diseases.[8] Stress-reducing and physical activity increasing events like owning a pet may eventually lead to reduced cardiovascular events, but there is not a common consensus about disease and pets.[9],[10],[11],[12] In this study, we aim to evaluate the role of pets in controlling BP levels.


  Materials and Methods Top


After the Hospital Ethical Committee approval, a total of 5,042 hypertensive patients treated were included in this study. Volunteer patients participated to a validated and self-applied questionnaire. Participants'median age was 59 ± 9.8 years (34 ± 8.0–81 ± 3.0), and 2968 patients (58.88%) were men. Of 562/5.042 patients (10.03%) owned a pet. Dog owners were 158 (2.82%), cat owners were 339 (6.05%), and farm animal owners were 65 (1.1%). The demographic characteristics including age, gender, history of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, body mass index (BMI), and the number of medications are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Baseline demographic characteristics of the patients with or without a pet

Click here to view


BP measurements were measured in both upper arms, using an appropriate cuff size for the arm circumference twice by a specially trained nurse using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, according to the European Society of Cardiology Guideline, 2019.[11] Patients were defined as hypertensive if their mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was ≥140 mm Hg, their mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was ≥90 mm Hg, or they reported current use of antihypertensive medication. Although relations between BP and cardiovascular risk exist from very low levels of BP as at SBP >115 mmHg definition of hypertension remains unchanged from previous ESH/ESC Guidelines. Our questionnaire included a group of standardized questions about patients and their demographic characteristics and were also included the questions asking their status of current exercise 3 or more times per week (no/yes), cigarette smoking history (never/past/current), current medication use (including the use of calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and one or multiple drug usage). And also, participants were analyzed about current pet ownership and the kind of pet. Debilitated patients and patients with a history of comorbid diseases such as malignancy, etc., were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (Version 18.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Variables were analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables were presented as percentages, and parametric variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Nonparametric variables were expressed as median (minimum-maximum). The normally distributed numeric variables were analyzed with the Student's t-test, and nonnormally distributed variables were evaluated by the Mann–Whitney U-test variance analysis. The categorical variables compared with Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.


  Results Top


The variables in SBP and DBP were attenuated after adjustment for kind of pet, age, age, sex, BMI, antihypertensive medication use, exercise, and diabetes are shown in [Table 2]. Of a total 4480/5042 (88.88%) hypertensive patients who completed the questionnaire were no-pet owners had mean SBP-143.9 mmHg (141.3–145.1 mmHg) and mean DBP-77, 6 mmHg (76.5–78.5 mmHg). Cat owners were 339 patients (6.05%) had mean SBP-132.8 mmHg (130.5–135.3 mmHg) and mean DBP-74.7 mmHg (74.8–75.3 mmHg). Dog owners were 158 patients (2.82%) had mean SBP-139.5 mmHg (138.1–141.2 mmHg) and mean DBP-77.2 mmHg (76.3–78.2 mmHg). Moreover, farm animal owners were 65 patients (1.1%) had mean SBP-133.6 mmHg (135.4–139.8) and mean DBP-73.2 mmHg (74.2–76.2 mmHg). Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–1.28, P = 0.002), farm animal ownership (OR, 1.08, 95% CI, 1.06–1.11, P = 0, 003), and aging (OR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.27–1.38, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher BPs. Cat owners and farm animal owners used fewer medication (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.61–2.72, P = 0.003) and (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.61–2.72, P = 0.001), respectively. Pet owners had significantly lower systolic and diastolic pressure values. In unadjusted analyses, pet owners had reduced hypertension levels (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59–0.89, P = 0.001). Based on the unadjusted analyses current farm animal owners had mean SBP = 133.6 mmHg (135.4–139.8 mmHg), cat owners had mean SBP = 132.8 mmHg (130.5–135.3 mmHg), and no pet owners had mean SBP = 143.9 mmHg (141.3–145.1 mmHg). Our study results reveal that cat and farm animal owners use fewer medication from nonowners (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.61–2.72, P = 0.003) and (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.61–2.72, P = 0.001), respectively. Farm animal owners had less coronary artery disease, diabetes, and not obesity. Characteristics associated with higher risk of elevated BP included male sex (OR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.07–1.28, P = 0.002) on no-pet ownership (OR, 1.08, 95% CI, 1.06–1.11, P = 0.003) and aging (OR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.27–1.38, P < 0.00). Female sex, cat, and farm animal ownership were related to lower BP levels. These results showed that pet ownership was independently associated with lower BP levels and less antihypertensive medication.
Table 2: Multivariate-adjusted analysis mean systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures and the odds ratios of blood pressures regarding the pet of the patients

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Although there are limited data available on the association about health benefit and pet ownership, a growing consensus supports the idea that pets might have favorable effects on human physical and psychological health. Stress has been related to the risk of too many diseases, especially hypertension, coronary artery disease, cancer, etc.[13],[14] Pets make the people more active, feel better and less stressed and its associated attributes.[15] Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that any social factor, including pet ownership that reduces stress, will eventually reduce cardiovascular events. Although Friedmann et al., and some small studies showed of 2–5 mmHg decrease in pet owners like salt reduction data regarding pet ownership and BP control is inconsistent.[8],[16] Cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial demonstrated that pet owners with heart disease had a higher survival rate and lower mortality rates in the follow up period in patients with pets.[17],[18] Cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial also demonstrated lower mortality rates in the follow-up period in patients with pets.[19]

Because of these inconsistent results about having a pet and disease, we planned this study to evaluate the impact of pets in BP regulation. Our study showed that current pet ownership was associated with lower BP and less medication in unadjusted analyses. Similarly, unadjusted analyses suggested that cat and farm animal ownership conferred more benefits with regard to SBP. The results of this study are in contrast with those of a randomized study in 72 healthy, middle-aged Australian men and women, which showed that the presence of a dog had no effect on BP during a task inducing mental stress.[20] In a report, one out of two people had a pet in developed countries.[21] Our study results showed that only 10% of our patients had a pet much lower than the developed world. Our study results showed generally better BP levels and make us to think to have a pet has a positive effect on BP regulation.

Study limitation

Our study has some limitations; first, the study is not a prospective, randomized controlled study. Second, long-term follow-up data are not available. Third, the information about the patients' attitudes toward the pets was absent. And also, in our study, BP recordings were done at one time at the office, continuous ambulatory, home recording BP values and other animals such as birds, etc., were absent. Finally, we did not have the patients' BP level before pet owning.


  Conclusion Top


Although our study had some strong limitations because it is not a cohort study, had not have BP levels before pet ownership, our study results revealed pet ownership was associated with better BP levels and less medication. Conflicting study results may be related to inappropriate pet-owning by individuals' needs and natality. Our study results also showed that owning a pet in our country is not as common as in the world. These results can be used to guide teachers, veterinarians, and nongovernmental organizations to make people get interested in caring for and owning animals. Stray animals, which is one of the big problems of the metropolitans, can be solved by this way. However, first of all, our study results make us to think individuals must be warned about their needs and natality before adopting a pet.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Emdin CA, Rahimi K, Neal B, Callender T, Perkovic V, Patel A. Blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2015;313:603-15.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2016;387:957-67.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: A pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet 2017;389:37-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lashkardoost H, Hoseyni F, Rabbani E, Moqadam FQ, Hosseini L, Azizi S, et al. Comparison of anthropometric indices in predicting the risk of hypertension, Iran 2014. Int J Cardiovasc Acad 2018;4:77-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Ikeda Y, Mas JL, et al. REACH registry ınvestigators. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA 2006;295:180-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Stevens VJ, Obarzanek E, Cook NR, Lee IM, Appel LJ, Smith West D, et al. Trials for the hypertension prevention research G. Long-term weight loss and changes in blood pressure: Results of the trials of hypertension prevention, phase II. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, Applegate WB, Ettinger WH Jr, Kostis JB, et al. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: A randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). TONE Collaborative Research Group. JAMA 1998;279:839-46.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Friedmann E, Katcher AH, Lynch JJ, Thomas SA. Animal companions and one-year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Public Health Rep 1980;95:307-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Friedmann E, Thomas SA. Pet ownership, social support, and one-year survival after acute myocardial infarction in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (cast). Am J Cardiol 1995;76:1213-17.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Allen A, Shykoff B, Izzo JL Jr. Pet ownership, but not ACE inhibitor therapy, blunts home BP responses to mental stress. Hypertension 2001;38:815-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2004. Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004. p. 172.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group, 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). European Heart J 2018;39:3021-104.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bennett PC, Trigg JL, Godber T, Brown C. An experience sampling approach to investigating associations between pet presence and indicators of psychological well being and mood in older Australians. Anthrozoos 2015;28:403-20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Antonacopoulos NM. A longitudinal study of the relation between acquiring a dog and loneliness. Soc Anim 2017;25:319-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Black K. The relationship between companion animals and loneliness among rural adolescents. J Pediatr Nurs 2012;27:103-12.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chowdhury EK, Nelson MR, Jennings GL, Wing LM, Reid CM, ANBP2 Management Committee. Pet ownership and survival in the elderly hypertensive population. J Hypertens 2017;35:769-75.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dickinson HO, Mason JM, Nicolson DJ, Campbell F, Beyer FR, Cook JV, et al. Lifestyle interventions to reduce raised blood pressure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens 2006;24: 215-33.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Parslow RA, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Jacomb P. Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community based Australians aged 60 64. Gerontology 2005;51: 40 7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kingwell BA, Lomdahl A, Anderson WP. Presence of a pet dog and human cardiovascular responses to mild mental stress. Clin Auton Res 2001;11:313-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Parslow RA, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Jacomb P. Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60-64. Gerontology 2005;51:40-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
McNicholas J, Gilbey A, Rennie A, Ahmedzai S, Dono JA, Ormerod E. Pet ownership and human health. A brief review of evidence and issues.BMJ 2005;331:1252-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed369    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded70    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal